State ex rel. Sartini v. Yost

764 N.E.2d 1038, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1509, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 789
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Sartini v. Yost. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 Ohio St. 3d 37
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 22, 2002·No. 01-1795·Published

Opinion

Ashtabula App. No. 2000-A-0034. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Ashtabula County. Upon consideration of the motion of appellees, Thomas Sartini et al, to strike Sandra O’Brien’s reply brief,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the reference to the affidavit and the affidavit itself are stricken but not the balance of the reply brief.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas and Resnick, JJ., would strike the entire reply brief, including the reference to the affidavit and the affidavit itself.

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., would deny the motion to strike.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Sartini v. Yost, 764 N.E.2d 1038, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1509, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 789 (Ohio 2002).

764 N.E.2d 1038 (State ex rel. Sartini v. Yost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.