State ex rel. Sartini v. Yost
764 N.E.2d 1038, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1509, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 789
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Sartini v. Yost. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 Ohio St. 3d 37 →
Opinion
Ashtabula App. No. 2000-A-0034. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Ashtabula County. Upon consideration of the motion of appellees, Thomas Sartini et al, to strike Sandra O’Brien’s reply brief,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the reference to the affidavit and the affidavit itself are stricken but not the balance of the reply brief.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas and Resnick, JJ., would strike the entire reply brief, including the reference to the affidavit and the affidavit itself.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Sartini v. Yost, 764 N.E.2d 1038, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1509, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 789 (Ohio 2002).
764 N.E.2d 1038 (State ex rel. Sartini v. Yost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.