State ex rel. Sartini v. Yost

764 N.E.2d 1038, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1509, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 789
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 22, 2002
Docket01-1795
StatusPublished

This text of 764 N.E.2d 1038 (State ex rel. Sartini v. Yost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Sartini v. Yost, 764 N.E.2d 1038, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1509, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 789 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

Ashtabula App. No. 2000-A-0034. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Ashtabula County. Upon consideration of the motion of appellees, Thomas Sartini et al, to strike Sandra O’Brien’s reply brief,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the reference to the affidavit and the affidavit itself are stricken but not the balance of the reply brief.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas and Resnick, JJ., would strike the entire reply brief, including the reference to the affidavit and the affidavit itself.

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., would deny the motion to strike.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 N.E.2d 1038, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1509, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sartini-v-yost-ohio-2002.