State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Pierce

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Pierce

230 So. 2d 751, 1970 La. App. LEXIS 5599

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided January 6, 1970·No. No. 11322·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

DIXON, Judge.

This case was consolidated for the purpose of trial with No. 11,323, State of Loui[752] siana, through the Sabine River Authority, State of Louisiana v. Pierce et al., La.App., 230 So.2d 752. Both cases involve the expropriation of tracts of land in DeSoto Parish by the Sabine River Authority. There was judgment in each case in favor of the defendants.

The plaintiff appealed, but, until after the day fixed for submission of the case, made no appearance nor filed any brief.

Under the authority of Rule VII, Section 5(b) of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, the appeal should be dismissed. See Benedict v. Stulb, 230 La. 995, 89 So.2d 768.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DIXON, Judge.

This case was consolidated for the purpose of trial with No. 11,323, State of Loui[752] siana, through the Sabine River Authority, State of Louisiana v. Pierce et al., La.App., 230 So.2d 752. Both cases involve the expropriation of tracts of land in DeSoto Parish by the Sabine River Authority. There was judgment in each case in favor of the defendants.

The plaintiff appealed, but, until after the day fixed for submission of the case, made no appearance nor filed any brief.

Under the authority of Rule VII, Section 5(b) of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, the appeal should be dismissed. See Benedict v. Stulb, 230 La. 995, 89 So.2d 768.

Appeal dismissed.

State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Pierce, 230 So. 2d 751, 1970 La. App. LEXIS 5599 (La. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

230 So. 2d 751 (State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related