State ex rel. Rohrer v. Holzapfel
11 N.E.3d 281, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1425
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Rohrer v. Holzapfel. Read the opinion of the Court — 139 Ohio St. 3d 1481 →
Opinion
In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition.
Upon consideration of relator’s motions for temporary emergency restraining order and for preliminary injunction pending the court’s consideration of the merits of the original action, it is ordered by the court that the motions are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Rohrer v. Holzapfel, 11 N.E.3d 281, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1425 (Ohio 2014).
11 N.E.3d 281 (State ex rel. Rohrer v. Holzapfel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.