State ex rel. Rohrer v. Holzapfel

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Rohrer v. Holzapfel

12 N.E.3d 1227, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1481

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 23, 2014·No. 2014-0268·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On consideration of answers of respondents Jane Krason and Hon. Leonard Holzapfel and motions for judgment on the pleadings of Jane Krason and Hon. Leonard Holzapfel. Motions for judgment on the pleadings granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On consideration of answers of respondents Jane Krason and Hon. Leonard Holzapfel and motions for judgment on the pleadings of Jane Krason and Hon. Leonard Holzapfel. Motions for judgment on the pleadings granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.

State ex rel. Rohrer v. Holzapfel, 12 N.E.3d 1227, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1481 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

12 N.E.3d 1227 (State ex rel. Rohrer v. Holzapfel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related