State ex rel. Rice v. City of Centralia
This text of 36 P. 484 (State ex rel. Rice v. City of Centralia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
— Many questions were presented in this case not involved in that of The City of Pullman v. Hungate, ante, p. 519, and it is probable that the action of the court below in sustaining the legality of the incorporation of the defendant could be sustained without the aid of the act of March 9, 1893 (Laws, p. 183), but the conclusion to which we have come, as shown in the case just cited, as to the effect of that act makes it unnecessary for us to discuss the other questions presented by the record.
The judgment of the superior court must be affirmed.
Dunbar, C. J., and Scott, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 P. 484, 8 Wash. 659, 1894 Wash. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rice-v-city-of-centralia-wash-1894.