State ex rel. Rice v. City of Centralia

36 P. 484, 8 Wash. 659, 1894 Wash. LEXIS 128
Washington Supreme Court·Decided March 28, 1894·No. No. 1257·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Hoyt, J.

— Many questions were presented in this case not involved in that of The City of Pullman v. Hungate, ante, p. 519, and it is probable that the action of the court below in sustaining the legality of the incorporation of the defendant could be sustained without the aid of the act of March 9, 1893 (Laws, p. 183), but the conclusion to which we have come, as shown in the case just cited, as to the effect of that act makes it unnecessary for us to discuss the other questions presented by the record.

The judgment of the superior court must be affirmed.

Dunbar, C. J., and Scott, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Rice v. City of Centralia, 36 P. 484, 8 Wash. 659, 1894 Wash. LEXIS 128 (Wash. 1894).

36 P. 484 (State ex rel. Rice v. City of Centralia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Bradley v. Berry
42 P. 622 (Washington Supreme Court, 1895)