State ex rel. Bradley v. Berry
This text of 42 P. 622 (State ex rel. Bradley v. Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a proceeding in quo warranto, and involves the validity of the organization and existence of the town of Water-ville, as a municipal corporation. This is the only question presented, and as it has been heretofore expressly decided by this court in Pullman v. Hungate, 8 Wash. 519 (36 Pac. 483), and-subsequently affirmed in State ex. rel. Rice, v. Centralia, 8 Wash. 659 (36 Pac. 484), and Abernethy v. Medical Lake, 9 Wash. 112 (37 Pac. 306), and as we are satisfied therewith, we decline to enter upon any further discussion of the question, and affirm the judgment rendered in the lower court .herein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 P. 622, 13 Wash. 708, 1895 Wash. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bradley-v-berry-wash-1895.