State ex rel. Recker v. Leonard

724 N.E.2d 805, 88 Ohio St. 3d 223
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 2000·No. No. 99-1571·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

For the following reasons, the court of appeals properly dismissed Recker’s habeas corpus petition.

[224] Am.Sub.S.B. No. 2, 146 Ohio Laws, Part IV, 7136, does not apply to persons, like Recker, who were convicted and sentenced before July 1, 1996. State ex rel. Smith v. Sage (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 209, 209-210, 699 N.E.2d 87, 88.

Moreover, Recker has no constitutional or inherent right to be conditionally released before the expiration of his sentence. State ex rel. Hogan v. Ghee (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 150, 151, 707 N.E.2d 494, 495.

Finally, the court of appeals did not err in assessing costs against Recker. Contrary to Recker’s contentions on appeal, he should not have prevailed in his habeas corpus action.

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Recker v. Leonard, 724 N.E.2d 805, 88 Ohio St. 3d 223 (Ohio 2000).

724 N.E.2d 805 (State ex rel. Recker v. Leonard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matthieu v. Thomas, 07ca009265 (6-2-2008)
2008 Ohio 2604 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
State ex rel. Bray v. Brigano
2001 Ohio 1587 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Reyes v. Tate
2001 Ohio 289 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
State ex rel. Recker v. Leonard
2000 Ohio 303 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)