State ex rel. Ragozine v. Shaker

767 N.E.2d 1176, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1456
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 2002
Docket2002- 0016
StatusPublished

This text of 767 N.E.2d 1176 (State ex rel. Ragozine v. Shaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Ragozine v. Shaker, 767 N.E.2d 1176, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1456 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

Trumbull App. No. 2001-T-0122, 2001-0hio-7062. On motion of George Tzagournis for admission pro hac vice of Sabastian Rucci on behalf of amicus curiae petitioners. Motion granted.

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.

On motion to strike amicus curiae brief of the 1,612 petitioners who signed complaint for removal [1457]*1457and forfeiture, etc. Motion denied.

Resnick, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
767 N.E.2d 1176, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ragozine-v-shaker-ohio-2002.