State ex rel. Raglin v. Brigano
696 N.E.2d 585, 82 Ohio St. 3d 410
Opinion
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion. Raglin’s claim challenges the validity or sufficiency of his indictment, is nonjurisdictional in nature, and should have been raised in an appeal of his criminal conviction rather than in habeas corpus. See State ex rel. Richard v. Seidner (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 149, 151, 666 N.E.2d 1134, 1136 (“Richard essentially challenged the validity of his amended indictment, a claim which is not cognizable in habeas corpus.”).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Raglin v. Brigano, 696 N.E.2d 585, 82 Ohio St. 3d 410 (Ohio 1998).
696 N.E.2d 585 (State ex rel. Raglin v. Brigano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Pickens
2021 Ohio 3878 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)
Smith v. Sheldon (Slip Opinion)
2019 Ohio 1677 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2019)
State ex rel. Rackley v. Sloan (Slip Opinion)
2016 Ohio 3416 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)
Gibson v. Wilson, 08ca85 (2-20-2009)
2009 Ohio 829 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)
Haynes v. Voorhies
110 Ohio St. 3d 243 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Lucas v. Richland Correctional, Unpublished Decision (10-6-2005)
2005 Ohio 5328 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Yost, Unpublished Decision (2-22-2005)
2005 Ohio 691 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
State v. Yost, Unpublished Decision (8-8-2003)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003
Gunnell v. Wolfe, Unpublished Decision (6-24-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2002
State ex rel. Bragg v. Seidner
2001 Ohio 152 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Buoscio v. Bagley
2001 Ohio 298 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Douglas v. Money
1999 Ohio 381 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
State ex rel. Raglin v. Brigano
1998 Ohio 222 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)