State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. Haney

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. Haney

2001 Ohio 1597, 93 Ohio St. 3d 497

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 31, 2001

Docket2001-0526

StatusPublished

This text of 2001 Ohio 1597 (State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. Haney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. Haney, 2001 Ohio 1597, 93 Ohio St. 3d 497 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 497.]

THE STATE EX REL. QUARTO MINING COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. HANEY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. Haney, 2001-Ohio-1597.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-526—Submitted September 18, 2001—Decided October 31, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-700. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Hanlon, Duff, Estadt & McCormick Co., L.P.A., and Gerald P. Duff, for appellant. Barkan & Neff Co., L.P.A., and Randy J. Kilbride, for appellee Carl L. Haney. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Erica L. Armbrust, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 497.]

THE STATE EX REL. QUARTO MINING COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. HANEY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. Haney, 2001-Ohio-1597.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-526—Submitted September 18, 2001—Decided October 31, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-700. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Hanlon, Duff, Estadt & McCormick Co., L.P.A., and Gerald P. Duff, for appellant. Barkan & Neff Co., L.P.A., and Randy J. Kilbride, for appellee Carl L. Haney. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Erica L. Armbrust, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 1597, 93 Ohio St. 3d 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-quarto-mining-co-v-haney-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack