State ex rel. Pollock v. Lillian & Betty Ratner School, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Pollock v. Lillian & Betty Ratner School, Inc.

920 N.E.2d 987, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1461

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 29, 2010·No. 2009-2165·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for redaction,

It is ordered by the court that the motion for redaction is granted, and counsel for relator shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, in this case within ten days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for redaction,

It is ordered by the court that the motion for redaction is granted, and counsel for relator shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, in this case within ten days of the date of this entry.

State ex rel. Pollock v. Lillian & Betty Ratner School, Inc., 920 N.E.2d 987, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1461 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

920 N.E.2d 987 (State ex rel. Pollock v. Lillian & Betty Ratner School, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.