State ex rel. Pollock v. Lillian & Betty Ratner School, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Pollock v. Lillian & Betty Ratner School, Inc.

918 N.E.2d 161, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1516

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 11, 2009

Docket2009-2165

StatusPublished

This text of 918 N.E.2d 161 (State ex rel. Pollock v. Lillian & Betty Ratner School, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Pollock v. Lillian & Betty Ratner School, Inc., 918 N.E.2d 161, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1516 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relators’ motion for redaction,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and counsel for relator shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, from the appendix of exhibits filed in this case within ten days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relators’ motion for redaction,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and counsel for relator shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, from the appendix of exhibits filed in this case within ten days of the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

918 N.E.2d 161, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-pollock-v-lillian-betty-ratner-school-inc-ohio-2009.