State ex rel. Pollock v. Lillian & Betty Ratner School, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Pollock v. Lillian & Betty Ratner School, Inc.

918 N.E.2d 161, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1516

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 11, 2009·No. 2009-2165·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relators’ motion for redaction,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and counsel for relator shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, from the appendix of exhibits filed in this case within ten days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relators’ motion for redaction,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and counsel for relator shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, from the appendix of exhibits filed in this case within ten days of the date of this entry.

State ex rel. Pollock v. Lillian & Betty Ratner School, Inc., 918 N.E.2d 161, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1516 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

918 N.E.2d 161 (State ex rel. Pollock v. Lillian & Betty Ratner School, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.