State ex rel. Pershall v. Woolsey

627 P.2d 520, 52 Or. App. 69, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2609
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 4, 1981·No. No. P-76-6, CA 16221·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

WARREN, J.

In his petition for reconsideration, defendant contends that we erred in affirming the trial court’s: (1) rejection of his offer of proof that the mother had sexual intercourse with another man near the time of conception; and (2) award of child support, attorney fees and costs. As to the first point, we adhere to our prior opinion. As to the award, however, we remand the case to the trial court for further evidence regarding the needs of the child, the financial condition of the mother, the interests of the state, and the father’s present ability to pay. While there is some evidence of the father’s financial status, i.e., income and bills, there is no evidence of the child’s needs, or of the mother’s financial condition. Fox v. Hohenshelt, 19 Or App 617, 625, 528 P2d 1376 (1974).

Reconsideration granted; former opinion modified; remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Pershall v. Woolsey, 627 P.2d 520, 52 Or. App. 69, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2609 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

627 P.2d 520 (State ex rel. Pershall v. Woolsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Washington v. Dilworth
735 P.2d 1281 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1987)
State ex rel. Pershall v. Woolsey
649 P.2d 625 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982)
State ex rel. Gleason v. Gregg
633 P.2d 1322 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1981)