State ex rel. Pershall v. Woolsey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State ex rel. Pershall v. Woolsey

649 P.2d 625, 58 Or. App. 605, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3304

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 18, 1982

DocketNo. P-76-6, CA A22682

StatusPublished

This text of 649 P.2d 625 (State ex rel. Pershall v. Woolsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Pershall v. Woolsey, 649 P.2d 625, 58 Or. App. 605, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3304 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is a filiation proceeding which has been considered by this court on two previous occasions and reconsidered on one occasion. This case was first before this court on appeal by the state from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendant. The state assigned as error the admission, over its objection, of certain evidence at trial. We found the evidence was erroneously admitted and reversed and remanded. State ex rel Pershall v. Woolsey, 32 Or App 257, 573 P2d 771 (1978). At the second trial defendant was found to be the father of the child. Defendant appealed, assigning as error: (1) the court’s rejection of defendant’s offer of proof that the mother had sexual intercourse with another man around the time of conception; and (2) the trial court’s award of past and future child support, attorney fees, and medical costs in an amount exceeding defendant’s ability to pay. We affirmed the trial court. State ex rel Pershall v. Woolsey, 51 Or App 339, 625 P2d 1340 (1981).

Defendant filed a petition for reconsideration of our decision. We granted reconsideration and adhered to our prior opinion on defendant’s first assignment of error, but remanded the case to the trial court for “further evidence regarding the needs of the child, the financial condition of the mother, the interests of the state, and the father’s present ability to pay.” State ex rel Pershall v. Woolsey, 52 Or App 69, 627 P2d 520 (1981). On October 14, 1981, the trial court heard further evidence relative to the award of child support, attorney fees and costs, and on October 14, 1981, entered its order. It is from this order which defendant now appeals.

In the present case, defendant challenges the trial court’s admission into evidence of the mother’s affidavit. The affidavit set forth the mother’s financial condition. It was admitted for use as substantive evidence over a timely hearsay objection. The state concedes error. Because the record, without the affidavit, is insufficient to support the trial court’s order, the order is reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

This is a filiation proceeding which has been considered by this court on two previous occasions and reconsidered on one occasion. This case was first before this court on appeal by the state from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendant. The state assigned as error the admission, over its objection, of certain evidence at trial. We found the evidence was erroneously admitted and reversed and remanded. State ex rel Pershall v. Woolsey, 32 Or App 257, 573 P2d 771 (1978). At the second trial defendant was found to be the father of the child. Defendant appealed, assigning as error: (1) the court’s rejection of defendant’s offer of proof that the mother had sexual intercourse with another man around the time of conception; and (2) the trial court’s award of past and future child support, attorney fees, and medical costs in an amount exceeding defendant’s ability to pay. We affirmed the trial court. State ex rel Pershall v. Woolsey, 51 Or App 339, 625 P2d 1340 (1981).

Defendant filed a petition for reconsideration of our decision. We granted reconsideration and adhered to our prior opinion on defendant’s first assignment of error, but remanded the case to the trial court for “further evidence regarding the needs of the child, the financial condition of the mother, the interests of the state, and the father’s present ability to pay.” State ex rel Pershall v. Woolsey, 52 Or App 69, 627 P2d 520 (1981). On October 14, 1981, the trial court heard further evidence relative to the award of child support, attorney fees and costs, and on October 14, 1981, entered its order. It is from this order which defendant now appeals.

In the present case, defendant challenges the trial court’s admission into evidence of the mother’s affidavit. The affidavit set forth the mother’s financial condition. It was admitted for use as substantive evidence over a timely hearsay objection. The state concedes error. Because the record, without the affidavit, is insufficient to support the trial court’s order, the order is reversed.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

649 P.2d 625, 58 Or. App. 605, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-pershall-v-woolsey-orctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack