State Ex Rel. Pence v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Pence v. Industrial Commission

2005 Ohio 6507, 107 Ohio St. 3d 286

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 28, 2005·No. 2005-0230·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. *287 Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Shawn M. Wollam, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Lane, Alton & Horst, L.L.C., and Barbara K. Letcher, for appellee Jet Corr, Inc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. *287 Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Shawn M. Wollam, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Lane, Alton & Horst, L.L.C., and Barbara K. Letcher, for appellee Jet Corr, Inc.

State Ex Rel. Pence v. Industrial Commission, 2005 Ohio 6507, 107 Ohio St. 3d 286 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

2005 Ohio 6507 (State Ex Rel. Pence v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related