State ex rel. Papp v. Norton

610 N.E.2d 979, 66 Ohio St. 3d 162
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 9, 1993·No. No. 93-126·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

According to her complaint, relator, Elizabeth A. Papp, is the defendant in a divorce and custody dispute pending before respondent, Judge Thomas F. Norton of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations. Papp seeks a writ of mandamus to compel Judge Norton to hear and timely dispose of various motions and to issue judgment entries accordingly.

On February 10,1993, we issued an alternative writ, 66 Ohio St.3d 1412, 607 N.E.2d 11, ordering Judge Norton to answer by March 2,1993 and show cause why the peremptory writ of mandamus should not be granted. As of this date, Judge Norton has not responded to our order. R.C. 2731.10 provides:

“If no answer is made to an alternative writ of mandamus, a peremptory writ must be allowed against the defendant \sic, respondent].”

R.C. 2731.10 establishes that the failure to answer an alternative writ is grounds for the court to issue the requested writ of mandamus. Accordingly, the peremptory writ is granted.

Writ granted.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Papp v. Norton, 610 N.E.2d 979, 66 Ohio St. 3d 162 (Ohio 1993).

610 N.E.2d 979 (State ex rel. Papp v. Norton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Howard v. Skow
811 N.E.2d 1128 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)
State ex rel. Morley v. Lodi
1995 Ohio 182 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
State ex rel. Morley v. Lordi
651 N.E.2d 937 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
State ex rel. Papp v. James
1994 Ohio 86 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
State ex rel. Papp v. Norton
613 N.E.2d 1042 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)