State ex rel. Page v. Hollingsworth

156 So. 286, 115 Fla. 851
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 27, 1934·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Motion to quash alternative writ of mandamus is overruled on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of State, ex rel. Tullidge, v. Hollingsworth, 103 Fla. 801, 138 Sou. 372, and State, ex rel. Tullidge, v. Hollingsworth, 108 Fla. 607, 146 Sou. 660.

The Respondents are allowed fifteen days from the date of filing of this Order in which to file return or answer. Respondents failing to file return or answer as herein directed, peremptory writ shall issue.

It is so ordered.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Page v. Hollingsworth, 156 So. 286, 115 Fla. 851 (Fla. 1934).

156 So. 286 (State ex rel. Page v. Hollingsworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry
297 So. 2d 628 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Grissom v. State ex rel. Stephenson
104 So. 2d 55 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
State Ex Rel. Sbordy v. Rowlett
170 So. 311 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)