State ex rel. Page v. Hollingsworth

156 So. 286, 115 Fla. 851
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 27, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 156 So. 286 (State ex rel. Page v. Hollingsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Page v. Hollingsworth, 156 So. 286, 115 Fla. 851 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Motion to quash alternative writ of mandamus is overruled on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of State, ex rel. Tullidge, v. Hollingsworth, 103 Fla. 801, 138 Sou. 372, and State, ex rel. Tullidge, v. Hollingsworth, 108 Fla. 607, 146 Sou. 660.

The Respondents are allowed fifteen days from the date of filing of this Order in which to file return or answer. Respondents failing to file return or answer as herein directed, peremptory writ shall issue.

It is so ordered.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry
297 So. 2d 628 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Grissom v. State ex rel. Stephenson
104 So. 2d 55 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
State Ex Rel. Sbordy v. Rowlett
170 So. 311 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 So. 286, 115 Fla. 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-page-v-hollingsworth-fla-1934.