State ex rel. Otten v. Henderson

941 N.E.2d 801, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1544
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 16, 2011·No. 2010-2223·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Clermont App. No. CA2010-09-070. On relator’s motions to remand and for leave to amend. Motion to remand granted, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals to rule on appellant’s motion for relief from judgment. Motion for leave to amend denied. Sua sponte, the briefing schedule is stayed, and the parties shall notify the court within ten days of the court of appeals’ ruling on the motion for relief from judgment.

Pfeifer, J., would deny the motion to remand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Otten v. Henderson, 941 N.E.2d 801, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1544 (Ohio 2011).

941 N.E.2d 801 (State ex rel. Otten v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Otten v. Henderson
2011 Ohio 4082 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)