State ex rel. Otten v. Henderson

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Otten v. Henderson

941 N.E.2d 801, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1544

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 16, 2011

Docket2010-2223

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 941 N.E.2d 801 (State ex rel. Otten v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Otten v. Henderson, 941 N.E.2d 801, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1544 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Clermont App. No. CA2010-09-070. On relator’s motions to remand and for leave to amend. Motion to remand granted, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals to rule on appellant’s motion for relief from judgment. Motion for leave to amend denied. Sua sponte, the briefing schedule is stayed, and the parties shall notify the court within ten days of the court of appeals’ ruling on the motion for relief from judgment.

Pfeifer, J., would deny the motion to remand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clermont App. No. CA2010-09-070. On relator’s motions to remand and for leave to amend. Motion to remand granted, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals to rule on appellant’s motion for relief from judgment. Motion for leave to amend denied. Sua sponte, the briefing schedule is stayed, and the parties shall notify the court within ten days of the court of appeals’ ruling on the motion for relief from judgment.

Pfeifer, J., would deny the motion to remand.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

941 N.E.2d 801, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-otten-v-henderson-ohio-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack