STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. CALLICOAT

2016 OK 31, 374 P.3d 777, 2016 Okla. LEXIS 31, 2016 WL 917106
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 9, 2016·No. SCBD 6359·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER APPROVING - RESIGNATION FROM OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION - PENDING - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS - AND - WAIVING COSTS

Upon consideration of Complainant Oklahoma Bar Association's (Bar Association) application for an order approving the Resignation Pending Disciplinary Proceedings executed by Respondent, Fred Bennett Cal-lHeoat, the application reveals:

(1) Respondent, Fred Bennett Cahcoat OBA #18519, was admitted to membership in the Oklahoma Bar Association on January 10, 2000. His official OBA roster address is 10208 S. Oswego Place, Tulsa, OK 74108. On February 25, 2015, Respondent executed a Diversion Program Agreement. On January 30, 2016, he submitted his affidavit regarding resignation from membership in the Bar Association pending investigation of disciplinary proceedings.

(2) Respondent's affidavit of remgnatmn reflects that he desires to resign and: a) it is freely and voluntarily rendered; b) he is not subject to coercion or duress; c) he is fully aware of the consequences of submitting the resignation; and d) he is aware the resignation is subject to the approval of the Supreme Court. He also intends the effective date of the resignation to be the date and time of its execution and will conduct his affairs accordingly.

(8) Respondent's affidavit states he is aware the Oklahoma Bar Association has investigated specific allegations of professmnal misconduct to wit: e

Complaint 1-Brians' Grievance

Kayce R. Brians alleges neglect of the client's adversarial bankruptcy proceeding and a failure to earn the $1,500.00 fee paid to Respondent. Following investigation of this grievance, Respondent executed a. Diversion Program Agreement.

(4) While enrolled in thé Diversion Program, complaints 2-15 were received by the Office of the General Counsel for the Oklahoma Bar Association and were under investigation.

Complamt Grievance

Brenda Lewis alleges that Respondent neglected her bankruptcy case and failed to communicate with her regularly.. During the Bar Association's investigation of this matter, Respondent failed to respond to its requests for information. The investigator and the process server could not locate Respondent until December 1, 2015.

Complaint 3-J ohnson's Grievance

Rochelle Johnson alleges that Respondent neglected and abandoned her bankruptcy case, despite receiving a $1,500.00 fee, and failed to communicate with her regularly. During the Bar Association's investigation of this matter, Respondent failed to respond to its requests for information. The investigator and the process server could not locate Respondent until December 1, 2015.

Complaint 4~Bénhetfis Grievance

Michael Bennett alleges that Respondent failed to prepare a contract for the sale of Bennett's land, failed to.earn his retainer, and failed to, communicate with him. The investigator and the process server could not locate Respondent until December 1, 2015.

Complaint 5-Thornton's Grievance

Byrder Maye Thornton alleges that Respondent neglected and abandoned her bank-ruptey case, despite receiving a $1,300.00 fee, and failed to communicate with her regularly. During the Bar Association's investigation of this matter, Respondent failed to respond to its requests for information. The investiga *778 tor and the process server could not locate Respondent until December 1, 2015.

Complaint 6-Goins' Grievance .

Sean Goins alleges that Respondent neglected and abandoned his bankruptcy case, despite receiving a $1,500.00 fee, and failed to communicate with him regularly. During the Bar. Association's investigation of this matter, Respondent failed to respond to its requests for information. The investigator and the process server could not locate Respondent until December 1, 2015.

Complaint 7-Haddow's Grievance

Andrea Haddox alleges that Respondent neglected - 'and abandoned her bankruptey case, despite receiving a $1,500.00 fee, and failed to communicate with her regularly. Dunng the Bar Association's 1nvest1gat10n of this matter, Respondent failed to respond to its requests for information. The investigator and the process server could not locate Respondent until December 1, 2015.

Complaint 8-Brown's Grievance

John Brown alleges that Respondent neglected and abandoned his civil matter, despite receiving a $1,200.00 fee, and failed to communicate with him regularly. Dunng the Bar Association's investigation of this matter, Respondent failed to respond to its requests for information. The investigator and the process server could not locate Respondent until December 1, 2015.

Complaint 9-Cooper's Grievance

Paul Cooper alleges that Respondent neglected and abandoned his bankriiptey case, despite receiving a $1,800.00 fee, and failed to communicate with him regularly. During the Bar Association's investigation: of this matter, Respondent failed to respond to its requests for information. The investigator and the process server could not locate Respondent until December 1, 2015,

Complaint 10-Capers® Grievance

Shaeina Capers alleges that Respondent neglected and abandoned her bankruptey case, despite receiving a $685.00 fee, and failed to communicate with her regularly,. During the Bar Association's investigation of this matter, Respondent failed to respond to its 1equests for information.

Complaint 11-Barrett's Grievance

Jeanie Barrett alleges that Respondent ne-_ glected and abandoned her small claims case, despite receiving a $800.00 fee, and failed to communicate with her regularly, During the Bar Association's investigation of this matter, Respondent failed to respond to its requests for information.

Complaint 12-Tran is Grievance

Son Tran alleges that Respondent neglected and abandoned the client's bankruptcy case and appeal of the civil judgment, despite receiving a $4,900.00 fee, and failed to communicate with her regularly. The Bar Association has not completed its investigation of this matter. -

Complaini Grievance

Ester Czubkowski alleges that Respondent neglected and abandoned her case, despite receiving a $1,500.00 fee, and failed to communicate with her regularly. The Bar Association has not completed its investigation of this matter, -

«Complaint 14-Martin's Grievance

Charles Martin alleges that Respondent neglected and abandoned his bankruptcy case, despite receiving a $1,800.00 fee, and failed to communicate with him regularly. The Bar Association has not completed its investigation of this matter.

Complaint 15-Williams' Grievance

Amie Williams alleges that Respondent neglected and abandoned her bankruptcy case, despite receiving a $1,600.00 fee, and failed to communicate with her regularly The Bar Association has not completed its investigation of this matter. '

(5) Respondent is aware that the allegations against him would constitute violations of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct, and his oath as an attorney.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. CALLICOAT, 2016 OK 31, 374 P.3d 777, 2016 Okla. LEXIS 31, 2016 WL 917106 (Okla. 2016).

2016 OK 31 (STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. CALLICOAT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. CALLICOAT
2016 OK 31 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2016)