State ex rel. News Herald v. Ottawa County Court of Common Pleas

668 N.E.2d 510, 76 Ohio St. 3d 1220, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 621
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 1, 1996·No. No. 96-1463·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relators’ motion to clarify alternative writ or, in the alternative, to expedite briefing schedule,

The court finds, sua sponte, upon reconsideration of its order granting an alternative writ, that whatever the apparent merits of relators’ complaint, a writ of prohibition is not the appropriate remedy to challenge the constitutionality of the order of a trial judge. Because relators’ complaint does not challenge the jurisdiction of the inferior court,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. News Herald v. Ottawa County Court of Common Pleas, 668 N.E.2d 510, 76 Ohio St. 3d 1220, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 621 (Ohio 1996).

668 N.E.2d 510 (State ex rel. News Herald v. Ottawa County Court of Common Pleas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related