State ex rel. Morales v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Morales v. City of Cleveland

621 N.E.2d 403, 67 Ohio St. 3d 573

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 10, 1993

DocketNo. 93-268

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 621 N.E.2d 403 (State ex rel. Morales v. City of Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Morales v. City of Cleveland, 621 N.E.2d 403, 67 Ohio St. 3d 573 (Ohio 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding these particular witness statements not exempt as trial preparation records. See State ex rel. Williams v. Cleveland (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 544, 597 N.E.2d 147; State ex rel. Coleman v. Cincinnati (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 83, 566 N.E.2d 151. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding these particular witness statements not exempt as trial preparation records. See State ex rel. Williams v. Cleveland (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 544, 597 N.E.2d 147; State ex rel. Coleman v. Cincinnati (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 83, 566 N.E.2d 151. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

621 N.E.2d 403, 67 Ohio St. 3d 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-morales-v-city-of-cleveland-ohio-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack