State ex rel. Missik v. City of Youngstown
This text of 602 N.E.2d 633 (State ex rel. Missik v. City of Youngstown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pursuant to our decision in State ex rel. Litten v. Indus. Comm. (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 178, 602 N.E.2d 624, we find that the commission’s permanent total disability finding, by attributing the award’s costs exclusively to PEL3212, did not encompass PEL4593 and PE626746. We thus find that the commission abused its discretion in. dismissing claimant’s permanent partial disability application in PEL4593. However, because PEL3212 and PE626746 both involve back injuries, the commission did not err in dismissing claimant’s permanent partial disability application in the latter claim. State ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Indus. Comm. (1980), 62 Ohio St.2d 147, 16 O.O.3d 166, 404 N.E.2d 141.
We thus affirm that portion of the appellate judgment that found no abuse of discretion by the commission in dismissing claimant’s permanent partial disability application in PE626746. The balance of the judgment is reversed. We order the commission to consider the merits of the application in PEL4593.
Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part and writ granted in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
602 N.E.2d 633, 65 Ohio St. 3d 189, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 2891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-missik-v-city-of-youngstown-ohio-1992.