State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

619 N.E.2d 1013, 67 Ohio St. 3d 445, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 1844
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 14, 1993·No. No. 93-1435·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration of relator’s request for oral argument and the motion of Hamilton County Conservative Forum for leave to file brief amicus curiae,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the request for oral argument be, and the same is hereby, denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae be, and the same is hereby, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that a writ be, and the same is hereby, denied, consistent with the opinion to follow.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. A.W. Sweeney, Douglas and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton County Board of Elections, 619 N.E.2d 1013, 67 Ohio St. 3d 445, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 1844 (Ohio 1993).

619 N.E.2d 1013 (State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton County Board of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections
622 N.E.2d 335 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)
State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton County Board of Elections
622 N.E.2d 329 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)