State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

622 N.E.2d 335, 67 Ohio St. 3d 605, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 2315

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 29, 1993·No. No. 93-1778·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

On September 29, 1993, the judgment in this case was announced. Our discussion and opinion in State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 597, 622 N.E.2d 329 applies to this case. For the reasons stated in Mirlisena, supra, the requested writ of mandamus is allowed.

Writ allowed.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur and concur separately. Moyer, C.J., Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in judgment. Pfeifer, J., concurs in judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On September 29, 1993, the judgment in this case was announced. Our discussion and opinion in State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 597, 622 N.E.2d 329 applies to this case. For the reasons stated in Mirlisena, supra, the requested writ of mandamus is allowed.

Writ allowed.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur and concur separately. Moyer, C.J., Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in judgment. Pfeifer, J., concurs in judgment only.

State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections, 622 N.E.2d 335, 67 Ohio St. 3d 605, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 2315 (Ohio 1993).

Pincite

622 N.E.2d 335 (State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related