State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

622 N.E.2d 335, 67 Ohio St. 3d 605, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 2315
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 29, 1993
DocketNo. 93-1778
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 622 N.E.2d 335 (State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections, 622 N.E.2d 335, 67 Ohio St. 3d 605, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 2315 (Ohio 1993).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

On September 29, 1993, the judgment in this case was announced. Our discussion and opinion in State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 597, 622 N.E.2d 329 applies to this case. For the reasons stated in Mirlisena, supra, the requested writ of mandamus is allowed.

Writ allowed.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur and concur separately. Moyer, C.J., Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in judgment. Pfeifer, J., concurs in judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 N.E.2d 335, 67 Ohio St. 3d 605, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 2315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sterne-v-hamilton-county-board-of-elections-ohio-1993.