State ex rel. McGowan v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. McGowan v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority

586 N.E.2d 112, 63 Ohio St. 3d 187, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 269

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 11, 1992

DocketNo. 91-486

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 586 N.E.2d 112 (State ex rel. McGowan v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. McGowan v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority, 586 N.E.2d 112, 63 Ohio St. 3d 187, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 269 (Ohio 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Following an established grievance procedure is an adequate remedy at law which will cause denial of the writ of mandamus. State, ex rel. Internatl. Union of Operating Engineers, v. Simmons (1991), 58 Ohio St.3d 247, 249-250, 569 N.E.2d 886, 888. McGowan could have filed a grievance under CMHA’s Administrative Order 11.18, which provides:

“Any employee may call to CMHA’s attention actions by CMHA or its employees affecting him/her by way of the Grievance Procedure. Specific grievance procedures outlined in this Administrative Order apply to non-[188]*188bargaining unit employees only. Bargaining unit employees are covered by the collective bargaining agreements between their union and CMHA. * * * y>

Consequently, McGowan is not entitled to a writ of mandamus, and we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI