State ex rel. McChesney v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. McChesney v. Henderson

258 So. 2d 550, 260 La. 1196, 1972 La. LEXIS 4948

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 15, 1972

DocketNo. 52142

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 258 So. 2d 550 (State ex rel. McChesney v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. McChesney v. Henderson, 258 So. 2d 550, 260 La. 1196, 1972 La. LEXIS 4948 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: David C. McChesney applying for writ of habeas corpus, mandamus and certiorari.

Writ refused. The evidentiary hearing held on this application in the trial court supports the validity of this guilty plea.

BARHAM, Justice, does not concur.

Neither the contemporaneous record nor the post plea evidentiary hearing show any explanation by the court of any constitutional rights to nor any waiver of the defendant of any of his constitutional rights before pleading. See my dissent in State ex rel. LeBlanc v. Henderson, 261 La.--. 259 So.2d 557.

TATE, J., concurs in denial.

See State ex rel. LeBlanc v. Henderson, 261 La.-, 259 So.2d 557. (Rendered March 8, 1972).

DIXON, J., dissents from the refusal to grant the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI