State ex rel. McChesney v. Henderson
Opinion
In re: David C. McChesney applying for writ of habeas corpus, mandamus and certiorari.
Writ refused. The evidentiary hearing held on this application in the trial court supports the validity of this guilty plea.
Neither the contemporaneous record nor the post plea evidentiary hearing show any explanation by the court of any constitutional rights to nor any waiver of the defendant of any of his constitutional rights before pleading. See my dissent in State ex rel. LeBlanc v. Henderson, 261 La.--. 259 So.2d 557.
See State ex rel. LeBlanc v. Henderson, 261 La.-, 259 So.2d 557. (Rendered March 8, 1972).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
258 So. 2d 550 (State ex rel. McChesney v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.