State v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Jackson

354 So. 2d 1380, 1978 La. LEXIS 7093

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 17, 1978

DocketNo. 61388

StatusPublished

This text of 354 So. 2d 1380 (State v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Jackson, 354 So. 2d 1380, 1978 La. LEXIS 7093 (La. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Eddie Ray Jackson a/k/a Eddie Roy Jackson applying for writs of certiora-ri, prohibition, mandamus. Parish of DeSo-to.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable John [1381]*1381S. Pickett, Judge of the 11th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of DeSoto, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 3rd day of March, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this Court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator — should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Eddie Ray Jackson a/k/a Eddie Roy Jackson applying for writs of certiora-ri, prohibition, mandamus. Parish of DeSo-to.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable John [1381]*1381S. Pickett, Judge of the 11th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of DeSoto, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 3rd day of March, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this Court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator — should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

354 So. 2d 1380, 1978 La. LEXIS 7093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jackson-la-1978.