State ex rel. Mays v. Miami Valley Masonry, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Mays v. Miami Valley Masonry, Inc.

2001 Ohio 1602, 93 Ohio St. 3d 501

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 31, 2001

Docket2001-0690

StatusPublished

This text of 2001 Ohio 1602 (State ex rel. Mays v. Miami Valley Masonry, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Mays v. Miami Valley Masonry, Inc., 2001 Ohio 1602, 93 Ohio St. 3d 501 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 501.]

THE STATE EX REL. MAYS, APPELLANT, v. MIAMI VALLEY MASONRY, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Mays v. Miami Valley Masonry, Inc., 2001-Ohio-1602.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-690—Submitted September 18, 2001—Decided October 31, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-672. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________ Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., James A. Whittaker and Stephen P. Gast, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jacob Dobres, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 501.]

THE STATE EX REL. MAYS, APPELLANT, v. MIAMI VALLEY MASONRY, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Mays v. Miami Valley Masonry, Inc., 2001-Ohio-1602.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-690—Submitted September 18, 2001—Decided October 31, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-672. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________ Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., James A. Whittaker and Stephen P. Gast, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jacob Dobres, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 1602, 93 Ohio St. 3d 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mays-v-miami-valley-masonry-inc-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack