State ex rel. May v. Hendon

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. May v. Hendon

1993 Ohio 92

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 9, 1993

Docket1992-2327

StatusPublished

This text of 1993 Ohio 92 (State ex rel. May v. Hendon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. May v. Hendon, 1993 Ohio 92 (Ohio 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Whitten, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions. The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

The State ex rel. May, Appellant, v. Hendon, Judge, et al., Appellees. [Cite as State ex rel. May v. Hendon (1993), Ohio St. 3d .] Mandamus -- Denial of writ affirmed. (No. 92-2327 -- Submitted January 12, 1993 -- Decided February 10, 1993.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-920381.

Morris May, pro se. Joseph T. Deters, Prosecuting Attorney, and Mark G. Waters, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Whitten, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions. The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

The State ex rel. May, Appellant, v. Hendon, Judge, et al., Appellees. [Cite as State ex rel. May v. Hendon (1993), Ohio St. 3d .] Mandamus -- Denial of writ affirmed. (No. 92-2327 -- Submitted January 12, 1993 -- Decided February 10, 1993.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-920381.

Morris May, pro se. Joseph T. Deters, Prosecuting Attorney, and Mark G. Waters, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1993 Ohio 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-may-v-hendon-ohio-1993.