State ex rel. Maurer v. Franklin County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Maurer v. Franklin County Board of Elections

514 N.E.2d 709, 33 Ohio St. 3d 53, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 409

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 14, 1987

DocketNo. 87-1628

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 514 N.E.2d 709 (State ex rel. Maurer v. Franklin County Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Maurer v. Franklin County Board of Elections, 514 N.E.2d 709, 33 Ohio St. 3d 53, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 409 (Ohio 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon consideration of relator’s complaint for writ of mandamus and motion for summary judgment, respondents’ motion to dismiss, and the parties’ stipulations of fact, it is ordered that the motion to dismiss be overruled, the 'motion for summary judgment be granted, and the writ of mandamus be granted as prayed for. We find that relator has filed her nominating petitions and statements of candidacy in substantial compliance with the provisions of R.C. 3513.261. See Stern v. Bd. of Elections (1968), 14 Ohio St. 2d 175, 180, 43 O.O. 2d 286, 289, 237 N.E. 2d 313, 317. Respondents are therefore ordered to immediately place relator’s name on the ballot as a candidate for the office of council member for the full term in the municipality of Dublin at the general election to be held on November 3, 1987.

Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon consideration of relator’s complaint for writ of mandamus and motion for summary judgment, respondents’ motion to dismiss, and the parties’ stipulations of fact, it is ordered that the motion to dismiss be overruled, the 'motion for summary judgment be granted, and the writ of mandamus be granted as prayed for. We find that relator has filed her nominating petitions and statements of candidacy in substantial compliance with the provisions of R.C. 3513.261. See Stern v. Bd. of Elections (1968), 14 Ohio St. 2d 175, 180, 43 O.O. 2d 286, 289, 237 N.E. 2d 313, 317. Respondents are therefore ordered to immediately place relator’s name on the ballot as a candidate for the office of council member for the full term in the municipality of Dublin at the general election to be held on November 3, 1987.

Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

514 N.E.2d 709, 33 Ohio St. 3d 53, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-maurer-v-franklin-county-board-of-elections-ohio-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack