State ex rel. Mack v. Henderson
This text of 305 So. 2d 542 (State ex rel. Mack v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re: Adam A. Mack, Jr. applying for Writs of Certiorari, Mandamus, Prohibition and Habeas Corpus.
Writ denied. See appeal: 243 La. 369, 144 So.2d 363 (1962). The alleged trial error does not constitute, under the facts, a claim for post-conviction relief. See State v. Hopper, 253 La. 439, 218 So.2d 551 (1969); Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 93 S.Ct. 1565, 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973); Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 So. 2d 542, 1975 La. LEXIS 3627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mack-v-henderson-la-1975.