State ex rel. Mack v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Mack v. Henderson

305 So. 2d 542, 1975 La. LEXIS 3627

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 10, 1975·No. No. 55700·Published

Opinion

In re: Adam A. Mack, Jr. applying for Writs of Certiorari, Mandamus, Prohibition and Habeas Corpus.

Writ denied. See appeal: 243 La. 369, 144 So.2d 363 (1962). The alleged trial error does not constitute, under the facts, a claim for post-conviction relief. See State v. Hopper, 253 La. 439, 218 So.2d 551 (1969); Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 93 S.Ct. 1565, 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973); Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969).

BARHAM, J., dissents from denial of writ. DIXON, J., dissents; applicant has been denied right of cross examination.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Adam A. Mack, Jr. applying for Writs of Certiorari, Mandamus, Prohibition and Habeas Corpus.

Writ denied. See appeal: 243 La. 369, 144 So.2d 363 (1962). The alleged trial error does not constitute, under the facts, a claim for post-conviction relief. See State v. Hopper, 253 La. 439, 218 So.2d 551 (1969); Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 93 S.Ct. 1565, 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973); Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969).

BARHAM, J., dissents from denial of writ. DIXON, J., dissents; applicant has been denied right of cross examination.

State ex rel. Mack v. Henderson, 305 So. 2d 542, 1975 La. LEXIS 3627 (La. 1975).

Pincite

305 So. 2d 542 (State ex rel. Mack v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related