State Ex Rel. Little v. Laurendine

196 So. 278, 239 Ala. 620, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 404
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 4, 1940·No. 1 Div. 88.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

*621 PER CURIAM.

The averments of the petition of Lauren-dine, as last amended, show the creation of an express trust in the Barrett property ultimately conveyed to the Peoples Bank of Mobile, in consummation of the joint adventure participated in by Laurendine on the one part and the bank through its president on the other to acquire said property, and the petitioner is entitled to participate in the profits arising therefrom after reimbursing the bank for the money advanced, with interest, and other lawful charges against said property, and therefore entitled to an accounting as prayed in said petition.

The demurrer to the petition was therefore properly overruled, and the decree of the circuit court is due to be affirmed.

Affirmed.-

All the Justices concur, except THOMAS, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Little v. Laurendine, 196 So. 278, 239 Ala. 620, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 404 (Ala. 1940).

196 So. 278 (State Ex Rel. Little v. Laurendine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gandy v. Hagler
16 So. 2d 305 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1944)
Cole v. Yearwood
3 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1941)