State ex rel. Leyendecker v. Duro Test Corp.
Opinion
Mandamus will not issue where the relator has a plain and adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 28, 6 OBR 50, 451 N.E.2d 225. For this reason, the failure to pursue an adequate [238] administrative remedy bars mandamus relief. State ex rel. Reeves v. Indus. Comm. (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 212, 559 N.E.2d 1311.
Under R.C. 4123.511(B)(1), claimant could have appealed the bureau’s order to a commission district hearing officer. The bureau’s order, moreover, informed claimant, in highlighted language, of his right and responsibility to appeal if he was dissatisfied with the wage as set. Claimant chose not to appeal.
The judgment of the court of appeals is hereby affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
719 N.E.2d 528 (State ex rel. Leyendecker v. Duro Test Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.