State ex rel. Lear Operations Corp. v. Crispen

923 N.E.2d 150, 124 Ohio St. 3d 444
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 4, 2010·No. No. 2008-2326·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Lear Operations Corp. v. Crispen, 923 N.E.2d 150, 124 Ohio St. 3d 444 (Ohio 2010).

923 N.E.2d 150 (State ex rel. Lear Operations Corp. v. Crispen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Lear Operations Corp. v. Crispen
2010 Ohio 686 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)