State ex rel. Langworthy v. Henderson

266 So. 2d 425, 262 La. 1106, 1972 La. LEXIS 4873
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 20, 1972·No. No. 52689·Published

Opinion

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. See dissent in Billiot v. Henderson, 260 La. 1131, 258 So. 2d 379, Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 553 and redactor’s comment (a) thereunder.

TATE, J., concurs in BARHAM, J.’s, dissent. DIXON, J., dissents from refusal to grant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Langworthy v. Henderson, 266 So. 2d 425, 262 La. 1106, 1972 La. LEXIS 4873 (La. 1972).

266 So. 2d 425 (State ex rel. Langworthy v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Billiot v. Henderson
258 So. 2d 379 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)