State ex rel. Billiot v. Henderson

258 So. 2d 379, 260 La. 1131, 1972 La. LEXIS 4902
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 8, 1972·No. No. 52158·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In re: Earl J. Billiot applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writs refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.

HAMLIN, J., concurs and observes that applicant does not contend that he is innocent of the crime charged. BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

Counsel pleaded for the defendant in this felony case. Defendant must plead “in person.” See Code of Criminal Procedure Article 553 and redactor's comment thereunder and see former R.S. 15 :257.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the defendant himself must plead and say the words “guilty” or “not guilty” under the law of this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Billiot v. Henderson, 258 So. 2d 379, 260 La. 1131, 1972 La. LEXIS 4902 (La. 1972).

258 So. 2d 379 (State ex rel. Billiot v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Ryan v. Henderson
266 So. 2d 448 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)
State ex rel. Langworthy v. Henderson
266 So. 2d 425 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)