State ex rel. Lane v. Craig
69 Mo. 565
Opinion
An amount amply adequate to pay. [569]*569the coupons, was in the hands of the treasurer, belonging to the railroad interest 'fund. He ought, therefore, to have paid the money, thus applying the fund to the purpose for which it was collected. Discovering no substantial reason why the judgment should not be affirmed, we order its affirmance.
Abeirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Lane v. Craig, 69 Mo. 565 (Mo. 1879).
69 Mo. 565 (State ex rel. Lane v. Craig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Stern Bros. & Co. v. Stilley
337 S.W.2d 934 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1960)
State Ex Rel. Rothrum v. Darby
137 S.W.2d 532 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1940)
Beach v. Myll
250 N.W. 324 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1933)
Bank of Chatsworth v. Hagedorn Construction Co.
119 S.E. 28 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)