State Ex Rel. Kingbridge Homes, LLC v. Friganza

Missouri Court of Appeals

State Ex Rel. Kingbridge Homes, LLC v. Friganza

267 S.W.3d 760, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1228, 2008 WL 4133833

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 9, 2008

DocketED 90051

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 267 S.W.3d 760 (State Ex Rel. Kingbridge Homes, LLC v. Friganza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Kingbridge Homes, LLC v. Friganza, 267 S.W.3d 760, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1228, 2008 WL 4133833 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

*761 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants June Joy Zuckerman and her son, Daniel Krueger, appeal the trial court’s default judgment in favor of Respondent Kingbridge Homes LLC in this action to quiet title after Kingbridge purchased Zuckerman’s property in a tax sale. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*761 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants June Joy Zuckerman and her son, Daniel Krueger, appeal the trial court’s default judgment in favor of Respondent Kingbridge Homes LLC in this action to quiet title after Kingbridge purchased Zuckerman’s property in a tax sale. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 S.W.3d 760, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1228, 2008 WL 4133833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-kingbridge-homes-llc-v-friganza-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack