ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC v. Easter

267 S.W.3d 760, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1232, 2008 WL 4133677
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 9, 2008·No. ED 90813·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dina Easter (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s judgment imposing sanctions against her for failing to appear at her deposition. The trial court entered a default judgment in favor of Respondent Asset Acceptance, LLC (Asset) and dismissed Easter’s counterclaim. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC v. Easter, 267 S.W.3d 760, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1232, 2008 WL 4133677 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

267 S.W.3d 760 (ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC v. Easter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Kingbridge Homes, LLC v. Friganza
267 S.W.3d 760 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)