State ex rel. Kansas City v. Nodaway County Court

48 Mo. 339
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedAugust 15, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 Mo. 339 (State ex rel. Kansas City v. Nodaway County Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Kansas City v. Nodaway County Court, 48 Mo. 339 (Mo. 1871).

Opinion

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the coui't.

This cause was before this court at the last term (47 Mo. 349), on a motion to strike out certain portions of the defendant’s return, as constituting no defense- to the relator’s demand.

In deciding that motion we distinctly held that the county had the power to subscribe the- stock.

An amended return is now filed by the respondents, in which they admit all the facts stated in the petition to be true, and they further say that they do not desire to- avoid any legal obligation incurred by the county; but they further state that they are advised that they are not authorized by law to issue the bonds, and they therefore pray the judgment of the court.

As the facts are admitted as stated in the relator’s petition, and as we have heretofore decided that the court had authority to make the subscription, nothing remains to be done but to award, the writ.

Peremptory writ ordered;

the other judges concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A. T. & Santa Fé Railroad v. Comm'rs of Jefferson Co.
17 Kan. 29 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Mo. 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-kansas-city-v-nodaway-county-court-mo-1871.