State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Schroeder

706 P.2d 558, 75 Or. App. 322, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3854
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 18, 1985·No. 24,880; CA A33352·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant, a juvenile, was committed to the custody of Children’s Services Division for placement in a juvenile training school. After she was paroled, the juvenile court entered an order requiring her to pay restitution. We decided in State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Lessaos, 64 Or App 626, 669 P2d 339 (1983), and State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Kreinbring, 64 Or App 630, 669 P2d 340 (1983), that, under ORS 419.507(1)(a), which authorizes the juvenile court to impose restitution as a condition of probation, the court may not order restitution when it has committed the defendant to a juvenile training school, because a commitment is not probation. Those decisions are controlling.

Order modified by deleting requirement of restitution; affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Schroeder, 706 P.2d 558, 75 Or. App. 322, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3854 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

706 P.2d 558 (State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Schroeder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Scatchard
145 P.3d 237 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006)