State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Schroeder
This text of 706 P.2d 558 (State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Schroeder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant, a juvenile, was committed to the custody of Children’s Services Division for placement in a juvenile training school. After she was paroled, the juvenile court entered an order requiring her to pay restitution. We decided in State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Lessaos, 64 Or App 626, 669 P2d 339 (1983), and State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Kreinbring, 64 Or App 630, 669 P2d 340 (1983), that, under ORS 419.507(1)(a), which authorizes the juvenile court to impose restitution as a condition of probation, the court may not order restitution when it has committed the defendant to a juvenile training school, because a commitment is not probation. Those decisions are controlling.
Order modified by deleting requirement of restitution; affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
706 P.2d 558, 75 Or. App. 322, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-juvenile-department-v-schroeder-orctapp-1985.