State ex rel. Juvenile Department of Clackamas County v. Kreinbring

669 P.2d 340, 64 Or. App. 630, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3699
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 21, 1983·No. J 81-7-3; A25763·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was committed to and placed in the legal custody of Children’s Services Division for placement in a juvenile training school. Thereafter, the juvenile court entered an order requiring him to pay $494 restitution.

Defendant contends only that the juvenile court lacked authority to order him to pay restitution after it committed him to the juvenile training school. We agree. ORS 419.507(1) (a) provides that restitution may be required “as a condition of probation.” Defendant was not placed on probation; he was placed in a juvenile training school. Therefore, the juvenile court lacked authority to order him to pay restitution. Accord, State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Lessaos, 64 Or App 626, 669 P2d 339 (decided this date).

Order modified by deleting requirement for restitution; affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Juvenile Department of Clackamas County v. Kreinbring, 669 P.2d 340, 64 Or. App. 630, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3699 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

669 P.2d 340 (State ex rel. Juvenile Department of Clackamas County v. Kreinbring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Schroeder
706 P.2d 558 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)
State ex rel. Juvenile Department of Polk County v. Lessaos
669 P.2d 339 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1983)