State ex rel. Juvenile Department of Clackamas County v. Kreinbring
This text of 669 P.2d 340 (State ex rel. Juvenile Department of Clackamas County v. Kreinbring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was committed to and placed in the legal custody of Children’s Services Division for placement in a juvenile training school. Thereafter, the juvenile court entered an order requiring him to pay $494 restitution.
Defendant contends only that the juvenile court lacked authority to order him to pay restitution after it committed him to the juvenile training school. We agree. ORS 419.507(1) (a) provides that restitution may be required “as a condition of probation.” Defendant was not placed on probation; he was placed in a juvenile training school. Therefore, the juvenile court lacked authority to order him to pay restitution. Accord, State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Lessaos, 64 Or App 626, 669 P2d 339 (decided this date).
Order modified by deleting requirement for restitution; affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
669 P.2d 340, 64 Or. App. 630, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-juvenile-department-of-clackamas-county-v-kreinbring-orctapp-1983.