State ex rel. Johnson v. Ryan

2010 Ohio 5676, 127 Ohio St. 3d 267
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 24, 2010
Docket2010-0505
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2010 Ohio 5676 (State ex rel. Johnson v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Johnson v. Ryan, 2010 Ohio 5676, 127 Ohio St. 3d 267 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} The Industrial Commission of Ohio determined that appellant, Olivia Johnson, was not the common-law wife of the late Silas Johnson and thus could not receive death benefits arising from the occupational disease that claimed his life. The Court of Appeals for Franklin County upheld that decision and denied Johnson’s request for a writ of mandamus. Johnson now appeals to this court as of right.

{¶ 2} In the course of the proceedings below, the matter was referred to a magistrate pursuant to Civ.R. 53 and Loc.R. 12(M) of the Tenth District Court of Appeals. The magistrate, in turn, issued a decision, including findings of fact and conclusions of law. Johnson filed no objections to this report.

{¶ 3} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(a)(iii) specifically prohibits a party from “assign[ing] as error on appeal the court’s adoption of any finding of fact or legal conclusion, * * * unless the party timely and specifically objects to that factual finding or legal conclusion as required by Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b).” Johnson’s arguments derive directly from the conclusions of law in the magistrate’s decision, yet she did not object to them. Accordingly, we can proceed no further. State ex rel. Findlay Industries v. Indus. Comm., 121 Ohio St.3d 517, 2009-Ohio-1674, 905 N.E.2d 1202; State ex rel. Wilson v. Indus. Comm., 100 Ohio St.3d 23, 2003-Ohio-4832, 795 N.E.2d 662; State ex rel. Booker v. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 52, 723 N.E.2d 571.

{¶ 4} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. *268 Timothy J. Krantz, for appellee Ford Motor Company. Sammon & Bolmeyer Co., L.P.A., and Albert C. Sammon, for appellee Jillian Johnson. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Sandra E. Pinkerton, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Marsha Ryan and Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cooper v. Cooper
2014 Ohio 4991 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2010 Ohio 5676, 127 Ohio St. 3d 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-johnson-v-ryan-ohio-2010.