State ex rel. Booher v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Booher v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc.

723 N.E.2d 571, 88 Ohio St. 3d 52

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 23, 2000

DocketNo. 98-1503

StatusPublished

Cited by107 cases

This text of 723 N.E.2d 571 (State ex rel. Booher v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Booher v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc., 723 N.E.2d 571, 88 Ohio St. 3d 52 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Claimant’s arguments before us derive directly from the conclusions of law contained in the magistrate’s decision. Claimant, however, did not timely object to those conclusions as Civ.R. 53(E)(3) requires. Civ.R. 53(E)(3)(b) prohibits a party from “assigning] as error on appeal the court’s adoption of any [54]*54finding of fact or conclusion of law unless the party has objected to that finding or conclusion under this rule.”

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI