State ex rel. Johnson v. Pike

161 N.W. 813, 38 S.D. 446, 1917 S.D. LEXIS 39
South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided March 22, 1917·No. File No. 4150·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GATES, P.. J.

Smith, J., having" presided at the trial in circuit court-of the case of State ex rel. Simons v. Nyquist, 22 S. D. 200, 116 N. W. 754, declines to participate in the decision of this appeal 'believing himself -disqualified. In that case the vital issues of this appeal were involved. The remaining members of this court being divided upon the questions involved herein, and there being no provision of law for calling in a substitute judge, the order appealed from is affirmed by a divided court. No costs will "be taxed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Johnson v. Pike, 161 N.W. 813, 38 S.D. 446, 1917 S.D. LEXIS 39 (S.D. 1917).

161 N.W. 813 (State ex rel. Johnson v. Pike) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Veolay, Inc. v. United States
21 C.C.P.A. 268 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1933)