State ex rel. Johnson v. Pike
162 N.W. 791, 39 S.D. 184, 1917 S.D. LEXIS 92
Opinion
This case is before us on rehearing granted as a matter of course because of section 23, C. C. P., as amended by chapter 124, Laws 1911. Judge Smith still declines to participate in the decision (see 38 S. D. 446, 161 N. W. 813), and, the remaining members of the court being divided upon the questions of law therein, the order appealed from is affirmed by a divided court. No costs will be taxed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Johnson v. Pike, 162 N.W. 791, 39 S.D. 184, 1917 S.D. LEXIS 92 (S.D. 1917).
162 N.W. 791 (State ex rel. Johnson v. Pike) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Glider v. Melinski
25 N.W.2d 379 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1946)
Olsson v. Pierson
25 N.W.2d 357 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1946)
In Re Estate of John Telsrow
22 N.W.2d 792 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1946)
In Re Estate of Brooks
294 N.W. 735 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1940)
Goodman v. Bauer
281 N.W. 448 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1938)
Reed v. Reed
281 N.W. 444 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1938)