State ex rel. Jefferson v. District Court

164 N.W. 1012, 138 Minn. 334, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 921
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedNovember 16, 1917
DocketNo. 20,714
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 164 N.W. 1012 (State ex rel. Jefferson v. District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Jefferson v. District Court, 164 N.W. 1012, 138 Minn. 334, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 921 (Mich. 1917).

Opinion

Taylor, C.

This is a case under the Workmen’s Compensation Law in which the district court of Ramsey county awarded compensation to Mary Ballauf for the death of her husband Joseph Ballauf. The question presented is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the finding of the court that the death of Joseph Ballauf was caused by injuries which he sustained while in the employ of the relator Jefferson. That he was crushed under a load of lumber and suffered several broken ribs and other lesser injuries, and that he was confined to his bed from that time until his death six weeks later, is conceded; but the relators contend that his death was caused solely by disease, 'and did not result in consequence of the injuries which he sustained. An autopsy disclosed that he had pulmonary tuberculosis in such an advanced stage that one lung had been entirely destroyed and the other to a considerable extent; also that he was suffering from other diseases. The relators called three physicians who testified that, in their opinion, his death was caused by pulmonary tuberculosis, and that the injuries which he had sustained pulmonary tuberculosis, and .that the injuries which he had sustained called no physicians, but other witnesses testified that the deceased had worked continuously at hard labor until the accident, had apparently been in good health at all times theretofore, and had never been able to leave his bed thereafter. In view of all the circumstances, we are unable to say that it conclusively appears that the injuries sustained had no part in causing his death, nor that the trial court was concluded by the testimony of the experts. The decision of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marsolek v. Miller Waste Mills
69 N.W.2d 617 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1955)
Haller v. Northern Pump Co.
8 N.W.2d 464 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1943)
Plotke v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
299 N.W. 216 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
United States Gypsum Co. v. McMichael
1930 OK 541 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930)
Valeri v. Village of Hibbing
211 N.W. 8 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1926)
Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.
209 N.W. 635 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1926)
Fraze v. McClelland Co.
205 N.W. 737 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1925)
Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.
195 N.W. 784 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1923)
Hogan v. Twin City Amusement Trust Estate
193 N.W. 122 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1923)
Mississippi Central R. R. v. Lott
80 So. 277 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 N.W. 1012, 138 Minn. 334, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-jefferson-v-district-court-minn-1917.